Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent."

AnarchistPhilosopher

Well-known member
Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent."

I am quite sure Ludwig self contradicts himself in that sentence.
what a faggot...
 

AnarchistPhilosopher

Well-known member
Better Logicians are Alfred Tarski's with his

two balls for the price of one (alongside Banach), and his Indefinability of truth theorem. Obviously Kurt Godel, even Bertrand Russel and there are more. But come on Ludwig, what an arse hole.
 

AnarchistPhilosopher

Well-known member
Since:

If the sentence "Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent" is true. &nbsp Assume "..." was not spoken then you should be silent of "..." , but it was spoken. &nbsp Now, since "..." was spoken you cannot be silent of "...", thus you actually proved that it's an iff and not just if, but by the above we cannot have both directions. &nbsp
 
למעלה